Intelligent Wisdom
reflections on the cognitive continuum
from myth to nondual thought
©
Wim van den Dungen
Antwerp, 2007 - 2008.
"As a man
thinketh in his heart, so is he !"
"Wisdom resteth in the
heart of him that hath understanding ..."
Proverbs, 23:7 -
14:33
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
I
: The Heart of Wisdom in Ancient Egypt :
01.
Visualizing the physical heart as the mind.
02.
The heart in the Old Kingdom.
03.
Conscience and the weighing of the heart.
04.
Thoth, the first to write.
05.
Intelligence-of-the-heart or the heart of wisdom.
II
: Conceptualization in Western ontological thought :
06.
Myth : simplifying "the beginning".
07. Proto-rationality in
Parmenides and Democritus.
08.
Conceptual rationality : the Sophists and Socrates.
09.
Concept-realism : Plato and Aristotle.
10.
Fideism or the onto-theological ground.
11.
Real and rational science in scholasticism.
12. Rationalism and empirism of nature.
13.
Kant, the shipwreck of foundationalism.
14.
Criticism and the Münchhausen-trilemma.
III
: Intelligent Wisdom after Critical Philosophy :
15.
The spirit and way of life of the philosopher.
16.
The own-Self and the heart of creative thought.
17.
Beyond the concept : reflective & reflexive nonduality.
Epilogue : Guidelines
Bibliography
|
The Architecture of Thought |
7 MODES OF THOUGHT
3 STAGES OF COGNITION |
|
I
pre-
nominal |
ante-
rationality |
1 |
Mythical
libidinal ego |
the
irrational |
|
2 |
Pre-rational
tribal ego |
INSTINCT
(imaginal) |
|
3 |
Proto-rational
imitative ego |
|
barrier between
instinct and reason |
|
II
nominal |
rationality |
4 |
Rational
formal ego |
REASON
(rational) |
|
5 |
Critical
formal Self |
|
barrier between rationality and intuition |
|
III
meta-nominal |
meta-
rationality |
6
|
Creative
own Self |
INTUITION
(intuitional) |
|
7 |
nondual
awareness |
I : The Heart of Wisdom in
Ancient Egypt.
The use of capitals in words
like "Absolute", "God" or "Divine", points to "theory" and reason. Hence, in the
context of Ancient Egyptian thought, words such as "god", "the god", "gods", "goddesses", "pantheon" or
"divine" are not capitalized.
"Osiris, the
scribe Ani, said : 'O my heart which I had from my mother ! O my heart which I
had from mother ! O my heart of my different ages ! May there be nothing to
resist me at the judgment. May there be no opposition to me from the assessors.
May there be no parting of You from me in the presence of him who keeps the
scales ! You are my Ka within my body, which formed and strengthened my limbs.
May You come forth to the place of happiness whereto I advance. May the
entourage not cause my name to stink, and may no lies be spoken against me in
the presence of the god ! It is indeed well that You should hear !'"
Papyrus of Ani, Plate 3 - ca. 1250 BCE - XIXth
Dynasty - British Museum
01. Visualizing the
physical heart as the mind.
In Ancient Egyptian, the word for "heart" was written in three possible ways.
(1) Heart as "ib" -Eeb- (F34) was written as ,
a single hieroglyph, representing a (mammal) heart + the determinative for "one"
(a stroke).
(2) Heart as "HAt" -Hat- (F4) was written as
, the forepart
of a lion ("HAt"), a bread ("t" - X1, phonetical complement) +
("ib" - F34),
used as determinative for everything related to "heart". The first two signs
("HA" and "t") + stroke determinative meant "forehead", "forepart", "beginning",
"the best of", etc.
(3) Finally, heart was also written as "HAtii", with two strokes added, or
, whereas
"Hatiiw" indicated "thoughts" ...
The semantic field associated with this visual sign, or icon of a mammalian
heart, was very rich, highly complex and encompassed all physical, emotional,
mental and spiritual states of the human. The heart represented the physical
heart, but also denoted the seat of thoughts and emotions, the mind, its
intelligence and understanding, as well as will, desire, mood, wish,
interiority, attentions, intentions, disposition, conscience and middle. In the
sapiental discourses (cf.
Amenemapt), it was the sacred shrine (devotion,
spirituality). In
funerary theology, the heart was the ultimate motor of the spiritual
transformation ("Xpr" -Kheper-) of the "bA" -Ba- or "soul" into "Ax" -Akh- or
"spirit" (in the horizon or "Axt" -Akhet-). The physical heart
was not removed from the body during mummification, and often covered with an
image of the dung-beetle -L1- "Kheper" ("Xpr") or "become", deemed helpful
during judgment.
The hieroglyph of the heart marked off the subjective state, quality or
"mental" condition which the Egyptians associated with the physical heart,
considered as the master receptor & coordinator and motor organ of the
organic, functional unity at work in the physical body. Likewise, the heart
was the "other" (read "inner") side of this coordination of movements using
conscious intent, causing speech (cf. the role of the tongue in the
Memphis theology). The heart explicitly refers
to the mind, as in : "thought of the heart", the "kAt" ( )
meaning thought or meditation (cf. to think, to think out, to say).
The notion of the "shrine" of the heart as the sacred place of the "inner god"
was a concept developed in the Late New Kingdom (ca. 1200 BCE), when personal
piety became fully part of the Egyptian cultural form (cf.
Hymns to Amun). By entering its "shrine", the heart (mind, desire,
will) is brought before the god, enabling the latter to dwell in the person.
Deriving their concrete (not abstract)
concepts from
natural differentials, the intellectual elite
of Ancient Egypt (scholars associated with the local House of Life) visualized
their thoughts in "sacred signs" (or "hieroglyphs"). Mythical, pre-rational and
proto-rational layers of cognition were superimposed and partly integrated into
concrete conceptualizations. This pragmatical, deep thinking of the Ancient
Egyptians was indeed unstable, but evidenced the first, unfinished "closure" of
the cognitive apparatus. Proto-rationality integrated both myth and pre-rationality. Tensions remained and turbulence was unpredictable and possibly
annual (cf. too much or too little Nile flood), but because of this
"hieroglyphic thinking from the heart" (allowing for a "multiplicity of
approaches" - cf.
Frankfort, 1961), a dynamical equilibrium was
achieved (and maintained for over thirty dynasties, covering 3000 years of
history).
Hieroglyphs (as Byzantine Icons) refer to a wider experience of reality, to an
understanding of the heart. Then, by using sacred symbols in particular
cognitive contexts, the surrounding macrocosm is visualized as one complex whole
of architectures, momenta & rhythms, which are also at work in human body,
conceived as a microcosm.
Note that contrary to (a) the physical body or "Xt" -Khat-, (b) the
"double" or "kA" -Ka-, (c) the ritual (noble) body or "zaH" -Sah- and (d) the
celestial body or "xA-bA.s" -Khabas-, the heart represented a state of
consciousness rather than a vehicle or executive, functional component
of man's soteriology. Its conservation was necessary because the general mastery
of life was projected in it. The heart was deemed responsible for the direction
of the rudder, the navigation on the river of this life and for the initiation
of spiritual transformation in the next (cf. the judgment scenes of deities, the
divine king and common mortals).
|
Chronology
approximative, all dates BCE
Predynastic Period
- earliest communities
: - 5000
- Badarian : - 4000
- Naqada I : - 4000 -
3600
- Naqada II : - 3600 -
3300
- Terminal Predynastic
Period : 3300 - 3000
Dynastic Period
- Early Dynastic
Period : 3000 - 2600
- Old Kingdom : 2600 -
2200
- First Intermediate
Period : 2200 - 1940
- Middle Kingdom 1940
- 1760
- Second Intermediate
Period : 1760 - 1500
- New Kingdom : 1500 -
1000
- Third Intermediate
Period : 1000 - 650
- Late Period : 650 -
343
|
02. The heart in the Old Kingdom.
In the Old Kingdom, both psychological and funerary identifications are attested
:
"I have come and I bring You the Eye of Horus, that your
heart may be refreshed possessing it. I bring it to You under your sandals. Take
the efflux which comes out of You. Your heart will not be inert, possessing it."
Pyramid Texts, Unas:32.
"There is no seed of a god which passes away
at his <word>, and You shall not pass away at his <word>. Atum will not give You
to Osiris, and he shall not claim your heart, nor have power over your heart.
Atum will not give You to Horus, and he shall not claim your heart nor have
power over your heart."
Pyramid Texts, Unas:215.
In the
Maxims of Ptahhotep (ca. 2200 BCE) and other
sapiental discourses, the word "heart" is always used to indicate
and/or express subjective, internal, intimate, "states" or "conditions" of
consciousness. In the context of the teachings, insofar as Maat is concerned and
is used as a good example, Ptahhotep summarized the
phenomenology of the subjective. The awareness of each human of him or herself,
of volitions, affections and cogitations, and the complex functions, organs,
subdivisions and strata of the psyche and her implicate processes are part of
the connotative semantic field of the word "heart" and its use.
The fact so many states of mind are mentioned, is suggestive of the
freedom enjoyed by the "heart" to turn to any side it desired. With the "heart", we touch upon Ancient Egypt's concept of "will" and "freedom".
Ante-rational thought did conceptualize the freedom to go wrong. Moreover, to
the ancients, a harmony, called "Maat" existed which was established with the act of creation
itself.
The Egyptian language of the Maxims captures the essence of the "state
of heart" in a pictorial, metaphorical and poetical way, leaving room for many
readings and an alternative "coupure" of the text. Indeed, to understand an
Egyptian concept one is advised to seek context before content. The
latter may be isolated within a given set of connotative meanings, but is never
defined beforehand as in the "geometrical" method developed by the Greeks (cf.
Euclid).
|
The
"heart" in the Maxims of Ptahhotep
every clause ends with det.
("ib" - F34)
heart is weary : to be tired in body and mind
;
the heart, ended :
the cognitive faculties being absent, finished ;
the exactness of
(every) heart : the correct, precise information given ;
heart get big/great : an inflated sense of personhood ;
directs the heart :
to be able to conduct & control oneself, a powerful man ;
seize your heart
(against) : to act aggressively against someone ;
control of heart :
self-control, restraint of one's personal drives ;
aggressive of heart :
the attitude of attacking another person ;
relieve your heart :
to undo oneself of a psychological burden ;
wash the heart :
to relieve oneself of feelings, whether they be anger or joy ;
little heart
: a man of weak cognitive abilities, an incompetent person ;
your heart desires : what you like or wish ;
the heart that robs :
the greedy person, the thief ;
evil on his heart :
evil intentions, negative feelings and/or thoughts ;
please the heart :
to satisfy oneself or another person ;
follow your heart :
enjoy your life, be happy, make a good life for yourself ;
the time of 'follow-the-heart' :
sum of all happy, joyful, unmixed moments of life ;
withdraw the heart :
to separate oneself from a situation or a person ;
reaches the heart : to enter consciousness, to become aware ;
heart
obeys his belly : the mind follows the instincts and the lower affects ;
heart is denuded :
sorrowful state of mind, degeneration of the sense of ego ;
great of heart :
great-hearted person ;
swallowing the heart :
to loose sight of reality, to falter, to forget ;
calms the heart :
to eliminate the harsh, unpolished sides of one's character ;
the heart rejects it :
a person does not accept a thought, feeling or action ;
greed of the heart :
the vice of always wanting more material things ;
gladden the heart :
to make a person happy, joyful and serene ;
whole heart together : to concentrate exclusively on something ;
a
high heart : to be haughty ;
the hot of heart :
a hot-heart or a hot-tempered, uncontrolled person ;
sad of heart :
a depressed, sorrowful person ;
frivilous of heart :
to be constantly light-hearted, gay and without concerns ;
obeys his heart :
to follow the rules one made one's own ;
vex the heart :
to make somebody furious ;
the trust of your heart :
the faculty of trusting something or someone ;
lacks in heart :
to be mindless, unconsiderate, disrespectful towards others ;
water upon the heart :
effeminate, unmanly thoughts, feelings & actions ;
test his heart :
to probe the authenticity of oneself or another ;
unbound of heart :
to be gay and joyful as a result of being without obligations ;
joyful of heart :
a positive, constructive attitude and a good sense of humour ;
the
heart twines his tongue : thought and speech match, are equal ;
heart ... a listener
or a non-listener : a person decides to listen or not ;
life ... are a man's heart : the core of a person is alive, healthy &
prospering ;
valued by the heart :
taken into consideration, given attention, be aware of ;
immerge your heart :
to be discreet, to hide one's thoughts, to keep to oneself ;
be
patient of heart : to be deliberate, to take
the time to collect one's thoughts ;
his heart matches his steps :
he lives & acts as he thinks and says, is straight ;
|
03.
Conscience and the weighing of the heart.
"O my heart !
Raise yourself on your base (so) that You may recall what is in You."
Coffin
Texts, spell 657.
In the Coffin Text, references to the netherworldly Judgment Hall
abound. Brought before this tribunal, the deceased had to recall his or her
life. To do so, the heart was crucial. If it abandoned the deceased, the cause
was lost. The Coffin Texts were written during the Middle Kingdom, but,
contrary to the New Kingdom Book of the Dead and its weighing scene, have
no vignettes (explanatory, cartoon-like drawings explaining the actions
surrounding the text).
The collapse of the Old Kingdom brought about a provincialism in which the nomes
(or 42 provinces) themselves and not exclusively the royal residence defined
Egyptian culture (as Memphis had between ca. 3000 & 2200 BCE). This triggered an
interiorization and the emergence of a personal accountability based on the
moral condition of the individual, i.e. on the nature of his or her heart. After
the Old Kingdom, a person's place in society no longer determined what would
eventuate in the afterlife (as had been the case in the Old Kingdom, where all
depended on being near the divine king). Whether one had acquired moral
rectitude was enough to be saved (i.e. dwell in the dark kingdom of
Osiris and, for the very few, ascend to Re's
heaven - cf. the
Pyramid texts of Unas).
From ca. 1940 BCE onwards, every Egyptian was deemed to have a "soul" or Ba. No
longer a Pharaonic privilege, the soul of commoners could now spiritually evolve
and also become a spirit or Akh. Although the elite of the elite (the divine
king and his family) would experience ascension to Re, commoners, if vindicated
by the independent tribunal of 42 Osirian assessors, could be regenerated to
dwell in the latter's netherworld, which had its own kind of heaven
(accommodating the spirits bound to the realm of Osiris). In fact, the kingdom
of Osiris reflected the kingdom of the Horus-king on Earth. A Solar (royal) and
Lunar (common) soteriology emerged.
"... my heart is
not ignorant of its place, and it is firm on its base. I know my name. I am not
ignorant of it. I will be among those that follow after Osiris ..."
Coffin
Texts, spell 572.
During mummification, the mortuary priest would pull out the internal organs
except the heart, which played an essential role in the mortuary rituals
performed throughout Pharaonic history. If moved or damaged, it would be
stitched together with great care. To assist a good outcome of its weighing, the
amulet of the Kheper Beetle ("xpr") was usually placed on top of it during the
wrapping of the mummy in linen.

The Weighing of the Heart
Papyrus of Ani, Plate 3 - ca. 1250 BCE - XIXth Dynasty - British Museum
In the Book of the Dead, the heart appears in the context
of being without blame (i.e. in harmony with Maat). The deceased did not wish to
loose his or her heart after judgment, for the heart was the seat of the Ba
(before it entered its ritual, noble body). Judgment came after the mummy had
been reactivated, so it could speak and adapt to its new,
postmortem environment.
But to enter the heaven of Osiris, it was decisive to have
passed the trial of the balance. A heart found to be heavier than a plume, the
symbol of Maat's justice, was devoured and with it the prospect of eternal life. Such a
heavy heart (burdened by sin), only invited the remainder to be eaten by the
monstrous "great devouress", the goddess Anmut
...
In the Book of the Dead, the process of deification of
everyman implied a series of initiatoric events, starting with purification,
then judgment and finally admission as a deity, or Akh of Osiris. Hence,
the heart was also a major "moral" center (cf. "conscience" or "super-ego" in
depth-psychology).
During life, the heart was closely related with the Ka and
(also) represented the cognitive aspect of personalized existence (i.e. the
mind). Hence, the importance of the words one had spoken during one's earthly
life.
The heart had to be restituted so the deceased received his
memory and personal identity back, for perpetual existence also implied personal
continuity. This notion is amply present in the
Book of the Dead, elaborating on the restoration of the
heart known in the Coffin Texts (and earlier, in the Pyramid Texts
of the Old Kingdom ).
In the famous scene from the
Papyrus of Ani, Ani and his wife enter the Hall of the Double Law or Double
Truth (divine versus human - good versus evil - eternal life versus second
death, etc.) to have Ani's heart, emblematic of conscience, weighed against the
Feather of Maat, emblematic of truth & justice. Ani's heart is thus the
epicenter of the whole scene, symbolizing Ani's thoughts, intentions and
conscience during his lifetime on Earth.
The central emblem is Maat's Feather. It represents the standard of truth &
justice immanent in creation, but also the truth of the declaration of innocence
made by the deceased (Plate 31) before the tribunal of assessors (the hieroglyph
for "not" is in red). By virtue of the rule of "reversal",
this declaration involved a "purging"
of possible past crimes. Three offences are repeated in the Judgment Scene :
-
never to diminish the
offerings made to the temples (against the pantheon & the people) ;
-
never to destroy what had
been made (against the memorial of the ancestors) ;
-
never to speak
deceitfully (against truth & righteousness).
What does the text give us ?
It starts with Ani invoking his own conscience but also his mother, from whom
he received his heart (cf. the major role of woman in nurture, but also as
representing the sacred "matrix" of life). We also learn his heart was
linked with the Ka "within the body", the vital power making and sustaining
one's stride. Next, Anubis weighs Ani's heart against the divine standard (the
Feather) and Thoth confirms no sin is found and the equilibrium of
the Great Balance is established. Finally, the Ogdoad of Hermopolis (headed by
Thoth), confirms the sentence spoken and recorded by Thoth and it is they -the
chaos-gods- who lift the curse of the Monster or Ani's "second death". Instead
of being annihilated, Ani will be allowed to enter the kingdom of Osiris
because he is "maa-cheru" ("mAa - xrw"), i.e. vindicated, justified,
triumphant !
What was the meaning of this afterlife scene to those still alive ? The
importance given to the heart could not be missed : it is a person's
conscience, determined by what he said (wrote) and did (how he lived), which
was deemed crucial. As Ptahhotep taught, just speech is the heart of a wise
transference of the best of the past to the best of today for the sake of the
future (so the memorial of the ancestors remains), as well as of the
continuous progress made over the generations. If we study Egypt's sapiental
literature, we do not encounter the notion a person may be
vindicated during his or her lifetime on Earth. On the contrary, in the Old
Kingdom, a non-royal could only hope to endure without being immortalized. The
sage was always in the process of attaining the state of veneration,
except when his vital force left his physical vehicle. Then and only then
could veneration be a final station (a terminus). Although since the
Middle Kingdom, deceased commoners could be immortalized and deified as
"Osiris-NN", nobody attained this state during his or her lifetime. Only
Pharaoh was a living god on Earth. Hence, even during his lifetime, Pharaoh
was "justified", for he "lived in Maat".
The concept of the weighing procedure invoked in this scene, is not restricted
to the afterlife (were it appears as the final "balance-sheet" of the
deceased). The sapiental discourses make it clear that in every situation, the
Egyptian wise seeks to do Maat, and does it by "measuring" the scale of
the imbalance in order to restore the Left Eye of Horus and bring it to
the forehead (i.e. realize a "tertium comparationis"). This to
harmonize life and end strife in Pharaoh's name, he who guaranteed the unity
of the Two Lands by returning Maat as voice-offering to his father Re.
First comes a careful, concrete investigation of what is at hand, in order to
discover its "balance", i.e. the two factors allowing the "Ka" to
flow (from high to low) and animate the given context. Next there is the
restoration by striking the "nil", the true balancing-point of the beam,
arrived at when the difference between the two weights is naught. Indeed, the
sinuous waters go up and down and when this flood equilibrates (not too much
and not too little), the inundation is perfect and the surplus large. The wise
has always enough reserves to compensate for any imbalance ... At the
balancing-point, Maat is brought to the nose of Atum ...
The wise of Ancient Egypt made the poise of the balance of truth & justice
rest upon the vastness of the non-equilibrium (chaos) constantly
threatening the survival of the cosmos. He knew this reclaiming of life by
death is of no avail if at every movement of the rudder, the boatman knows
how to balance the bark and master the waters, whether he be traveling on
Earth or on the Nile of the netherworld. His commanding excellence made his
bark float upon the chaotic ocean. His just word was the primordial hill, or
the emergence of order out of chaos, the making of the beam of the
balance, keeping the two scales together and separated, allowing one to
"walk upon the waters", using the surface-tensions of their chaos.
04.
Thoth, the first to write.
Thoth's name, written as G26, the hieroglyph of
the Ibis :

appeared perched on a standard on slate palettes of the Late Predynastic
Period. The sacred Ibis (Ibis religiosa) had a long curved beak,
suggestive of the crescent New Moon, and black & white feathering reminiscent
of the Lunar phases of waxing & waning. In the Old Kingdom, the association
between the Ibis and Thoth had already been made, for in the afterlife, the
wings of Thoth carried Pharaoh over the celestial river (cf. Pyramid Texts,
§ 1176 & § 1254).
Hopfner
(1914) thought "DHw" could have been the oldest
name of the Ibis, implying that Thoth ("DHwT" or "Djehuti") would mean : "he
who has the nature of the Ibis". Others, like
Wessetzky (1958), conjecture it proceeds from
"HwwT" or "messenger" with prefix I10, "D".
Another, less common, pictogram for Thoth was the squatting baboon, who
greeted the dawning Sun with agitated, chattering sounds. These baboons are
also represented on their hind legs with front paws raised in praise and
greeting of Re (cf. the First Hour of the
Amduat). They faced the rising Sun (cf. above
the statues of Ramesses II at Abu Simbel). In both instances, Thoth wears a
crown representing the crescent Moon supporting the disk of the Full Moon. In
the Middle Kingdom, he was worshipped in all of Egypt. In all major temples,
the cult of Thoth was present. Why ?
An exceptional deity, not part of the royal
Heliopolitan Ennead, but with an Ogdoad of his
own, he was the secretary of Re, and so the "scribe of the gods". He was Re's
messenger, who promulgated the laws of "the Lord of All" or sole creator-god,
Atum-Kheper-Re. He was a traveler and an international deity, for his name
can be found in many ancient languages : neo-Babylonian, Coptic, Aramean,
Greek & Latin. Thoth represented the embodiment of all knowledge and
literature. He had invented writing and wrote himself. His most important
record was the outcome of the mythical battle between Upper Egyptian Seth and
Lower Egyptian Horus, the son of Osiris and Isis. Thoth was at the command of
all the divine books in the House of Life. The wisdom of Thoth was revered and
considered too secret for profane eyes.
In the Middle Kingdom story of the magician Djedi, a man of a hundred and ten,
we read that Djedi knew the number of the secret chambers of the
sanctuary of Thoth. The latter was "mdw nTr" "medu netjer", the "word of the
god", namely Re. He is called the "son of Re" and "Lord of the Eight gods" (of
Hermopolis, Thoth's cult centre). In the funerary rituals, Thoth acted the
part of the recorder, and his decision was accepted by all deities. Thoth
observed whether the heart (mind) of the deceased was light enough to balance
the feather of truth & justice. This by "weighing the words", for the
heaviness of heart was the result of unwholesome speech (cf. the
insistence on silence serving magical purposes). Thoth was also the ultimate
teacher of magic, ritualism & the words of power which opened the secret
pylons of the underworld. As healer of the Left Eye of Horus (cf.
wedjat), Thoth is the deity of medicine.
His original home was Khemenu, or "eight-town", referring to the four pairs of
mythical chaos-gods existing before creation (cf.
Nun), of which Thoth became the leader and head. The Greeks called
it Hermopolis. In myth, it was famous for the "high ground" on which Re rested
when he rose for the first time. This "risen land" was a central metaphor, an
example of the emergence of creation out of the undifferentiated waters,
in which inert chaos lay dormant.
This chaos of pre-existence was personified by the Ogdoad of Hermopolis,
showing this theology was intimately linked with the "mind of Re"
speaking its Great Word transforming the pre-creational, chaotic Ogdoad
Egg (cf. the "Eight of Hermopolis", four female snake-goddesses & four male
frog-gods with Predynastic roots) into the created Ennead of Hermopolis,
headed by the "First of the Eight", the
Great Word of Re, Thoth. The Hermopolitan scheme is
magical, for the true magician (like Pharaoh) finds his origin not in the
pantheon, but before the Ennead and Ogdoad.
In Isis and the other great goddesses (personifications of the Great Sorceress),
the balance tilted towards Lunar sacrality, in Osiris- Pharaoh, Follower of
Horus, son of Re, towards Solar divinity, but in both cases not exclusively.
Isis knew the "true name" of Re without which Osiris would not have
resurrected. The divinity of Pharaoh was not without the sacred, for he was
the son of Her who bore Atum !
The peace of Thoth was a neutrality which was also the objective guarantee of
objectivity, truth and justice. This middle path had chaotic polarities of
equal force (four females, four males) surrounding it. Slight movements away from
the straight path could imply going astray and be assimilated by either
polarity of the Ogdoad. Disease was the outcome of this loss of equilibrium
between and control over the forces of chaos. Through the power of the Great
Word, the greatest evil could be conquered (cf. the overthrowing of Apophis,
the giant snake trying to swallow Re before
dawn). The creative verb is dropped by the sacred Ibis, and order is restored.
The mind of Re brings clarity, distinction and operational control in all
contexts.
Thoth is known as the divine witness, mediator & messenger who recorded
things as they were. He was also the arbiter, and his duty was to prevent Set
or Horus from destroying the other. He was able to keep these hostile forces
in exact equilibrium. Darkness & light, night & day, evil & good were balanced
by Thoth, the heart and tongue of Re. It is Thoth who spoke the Great Word, resulting in the wishes of Re being carried into effect, and once he had
given an authorative command ("Hu") and had put it into writing, it could not fail to realize
itself ("Heka").
The androgynous nature of Thoth can be derived from his being a male deity.
Just as the great magic of mother Isis (female) was derived from her knowing
the true name of the creator Re (male), so was the writer Thoth (male) a great
magician because he (as the mind of Re) knew how to practice the sacred Lunar
traditions (female) to invent writing, science & literature. Pharaoh (male),
Lord of the Two Lands, was the greatest of magicians, because as a living
god on Earth he had assimilated the power of the sacred Great Sorceress
Herself (being Her son) and hence Pharaoh stood before the Enneads abiding in
the sky. Pharaoh's Great Word was spoken by a living god-with-us, and
hence Pharaoh's "heka"
was outstandingly sublime and greater than the greatest deities.
To acclimatize to Egypt, the Greeks identified their gods with native divinities. In the Late
Period, Thoth was probably the most popular and diverse deity of the Egyptian
pantheon. Indeed, in the Late New Kingdom, Third Intermediate and Late Period,
individual destiny and fate had become increasingly important. Both lay in the
hand of the gods and this fate could be derived by studying the rhythms of
planets & stars (astrology, entering Egypt from Babylon).
Although a national deity, Thoth had local associations and particularities
and was regarded as a Moon-god, determining the rhythms of Egyptian national
life (festivals & calendars). As "Lord of Time", Thoth, the mysterious, ruled
individual destinies too, and was thus very popular. By extension he was lord
of knowledge, language, all science, magic, writing and understanding. He was
the creator who called things into being merely by the sound of his voice. As
guide and judge of the dead, Thoth owed much popularity with common people,
and the "power of the Moon" was invoked in the
wisdom teachings.
The Greek settlers identified their god Hermes with Thoth. Like Thoth, he
was Lunar, and associated with medicine and the realm of the dead. Both were
tricksters and messengers. Hermes was the "logos", the interpreter of Divine
Will to humanity. In Stoic philosophy, Hermes is both "logos" and "demiurge",
which probably owed something to the Hermopolitans. In Alexandrian Egypt, the
Greek Hermes (identified with Thoth), became cosmopolitan and Hellenistic, but
Egyptianized and known throughout the Roman world as "the Egyptian".
Interestingly, by intermingling native Egyptian (Thoth) and Greek theology
(Hermes) with Hellenistic philosophy, a syncretic sum was produced, a major
and crucial archetypal idea, which encompassed the function of the cognitive
in the Mediterranean cultures of before Christianity :
Hermes
Trismegistus,
or Hermes the "Thrice Greatest". Indeed, during their
rituals, the Egyptians used to call Thoth "Great ! Great ! Great !".
However, by people of Greek culture, Trismegistus was not envisaged in the
same way as the Egyptians saw him. The Greeks produced fictional stories to
explain the emergence of Hermes Trismegistus (cf. the
Tabula Smaragdina).
For example, it was widely circulated Homer was an Egyptian and a son of
Hermes ! The learned Greeks invented a "human" Trismegistus.
The "philosophical" Hermetica (the Corpus Hermeticum) presented Hermes
as a teacher of wisdom. However, in the "technical" Hermetica (the Greek
magical papyri which readapt Egyptian magic), Thoth appeared, for there
Trismegistus was seen as a cosmic deity, able to dwell in the heart of his
devotees and object of identification for the magician. This ambiguity of
Hermes Trismegistus, the dual-union between the Divine and the human, must
have struck many. It may explain why Hermes is mentioned in early Christian
literature (cf. the two natures of Christ). Hermetical principles were
imported in Europe in the XI - XIIth century by the monastic movement (as part
of the "Orientale Lumen" - cf. Bernard of Clairvaux, Willem of St.Thierry).
Hermes Trismegistus the wisdom-teacher influenced both
Christianity and
Islam. Besides its dogmatic canon,
Early Christianity
was influenced by neo-Platonism and Stoicism, both linked with
Alexandrian Hermetism,
and the Pagan notions of "Divine Mind", "World Soul", "Demiurge" and "Pure
Act" (developed in the New Kingdom and returning in Classical Greek
philosophy).
Through Harran, Hermes established his place in Islamic sciences, which in
turn would help initiate the European Renaissance in XIVth century Italy. It
is at this point a new mixture was brewed, one which called into being a
re-Platonized egyptomanic Hermeticism conquering Europe and finally
the New World. It is still with us in Egyptian Masonic Orders and the various
branches of Californian New Age religion.
Three fundamental phases appear :
-
native
Hermopolitan theology : the perennial worship of the native
Egyptian Thoth, "Thrice Greatest", centered in Hermopolis
("Hermoupolis Magna") ;
-
historical
Hermetism : the identification of Thoth with Hermes Trismegistus,
who, in his Graeco-Alexandrian, philosophical teachings (between ca.
150 BCE and 250 CE) is
Greek
and human (although Egyptian elements persist), but who assumed, in
the technical Hermetica, the cosmicity of the Egyptian Thoth ;
-
literary
Hermeticism : the Renaissance produced a fictional European
Trismegistus, based on
the Alexandrian Hermes Trismegistus
and a misunderstood Ancient Egyptian language. Trismegistus became the
patron of alchemy, magic, mystery orders, freemasonry, astrology, the
New Age,
the Western tradition
... and all matters occult.
Thoth was the first to write. The hieroglyphic system
reflects his mentality, for it aims at a fluent communication of the pictorial,
non-cerebral, parallel, non-linear "intelligence of the heart", integrating
(although ante-rationally) the early layers of cognition, namely its mythical,
pre-rational and proto-rational sedimentations.
Our knowledge of the Ancient Egyptian language is
the result of modern scholarship, for since the Renaissance, a symbolical and
allegorical interpretation was favored, which proved to be wrong (but based on
the practice of allegorical mystifications of Egyptian priests working under the
Ptolemies). Egyptian belongs to the Afro-Asiatic language family, and is related
to Arabic, Ethiopic and Hebrew, but also to North African (Hamitic) languages
such as Berber and Cushitic. Being the longest continually attested language in
the world, it appeared ca. 3000 BCE and remained in use until the XIth century
CE.
The learned Jesuit antiquarian Athanasius Kircher (1602 - 1680) proposed
nonsensical allegorical translations (Lingua Aegyptical restituta, 1643).
Thomas Young (1773 -1829), the author of the undulatory theory of light, who had
assigned the correct
phonetical values to five hieroglyphic signs, still maintained these
alphabetical signs were written together with allegorical signs, which,
according to him, formed the bulk. The final decipherment, starting as late as
1822, was the work of the Frenchman Jean-François Champollion, 1790 - 1832, cf.
Précis du système hiéroglyphique des anciens égyptiens par M.Champollion le
jeune, 1824.
Champollion, who had a very good knowledge of Coptic (the last stage of
Egyptian), proved the assumption of the allegorists wrong. He showed, especially
aided by the presence of the Rosetta Stone, Egyptian (as any other
language) assigned phonetical values to signs. These formed consonantal
structures as in Hebrew and Arabic. He also discovered that some were pictures
indicating the category of the preceding words, the so-called "determinatives".
After Champollion's death in 1832, the lead in Egyptology passed to Germany
(Richard Lepsius, 1810 - 1884). This Berlin school shaped Egyptian philology for
the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, in particular scholars such as Adolf
Erman (1854 - 1937), Kurt Sethe (1869 - 1934), who, together with Francis
Griffith (1862 - 1934), Battiscombe Gunn (1883 - 1950) and Alan Gardiner (1879 -
1963) in England, laid the systematic basis for the study of Egyptian. Later,
Jacob Polotsky (1905 - 1991) established the "standard theory" of Egyptian
grammar. These efforts finally made the historical record available to scholars
of other disciplines. Hence, by interdisciplinary work, the impact of
Pharaonic Egypt on all Mediterranean cultures of antiquity can be put into
evidence. The result being, that Ancient Egypt can no longer neglected in the
history of the formation of the European intellectual movements (cf. Egypt's
impact on Greek philosophy, in particular
Memphite thought).
The first hieroglyphs were written down towards the end of the Terminal
Predynastic period (end of the fourth millennium BCE), often attached as labels
on commodities. There is a continuous recorded until the eleventh century CE,
when Coptic (the last stage of the language) expired as a spoken tongue and was
superseded by Arabic.
The Egyptian language knew six stages :
* Archaic Egyptian (first two Dynasties)
* Old Egyptian (Old Kingdom)
* Middle Egyptian (First Intermediate Period & Middle Kingdom)
* Late Egyptian (New Kingdom & Third Intermediate Period)
* Demotic Egyptian (Late Period)
* Coptic (Roman Period).
In the last two stages, new scripts emerged and only in Coptic is the
vocalic structure known, with distinct dialects. Archaic Egyptian consists
of brief inscriptions. Old Egyptian has the first continuous texts. Middle
Egyptian is the "classical form" of the language. Late Egyptian is very
different from Old and Middle Egyptian (cf. the verbal structure). Although over
6000 hieroglyphs have been documented, only about 700 are attested for Middle
Egyptian (the majority of other hieroglyphs are found in Graeco-Roman temples
only).
modes
of thought |
examples
in Egyptian literature |
major stages of
growth in the formation of Middle Egyptian |
mythical
sensori-motoric |
Gerzean ware design schemata,
early palettes |
individual hieroglyphs, labels,
no texts, no grammar, cartoon-like style - Predynastic
|
pre-rational
pre-operatoric |
Relief of Snefru, Biography of
Methen, Sinai Inscriptions, Testamentary Enactment
Pyramid Texts |
individual words with archaic
sentences, a rudimentary grammar to simple sentences in the
"record" style of the Old Kingdom
|
proto-rational
concrete operations |
Maxims of Ptahhotep,
Coffin Texts,
Sapiental literature, ...
Great Hymn to the Aten
...
Memphis Theology |
from simple sentences to the
classical form of a fine literary language capable of more further
changes
|
Egyptian hieroglyphs is a system of writing which, fully
developed, had 2 classes of signs : logograms & phonograms. The phonograms refer
to the actual sounds of the language. Each letter is a phoneme. The consonantal
phonograms, representing either one, two or three phonemes are without
vocalization, and so lack pronunciation.
Hieroglyphic Egyptian gives a pale reflection of the spoken tongue, and was used
as a ceremonial, sacred language. At best, we may derive guides to pronunciation
based on Coptic. The "e" of Egyptology is only a convention.

Mainly found in temples & tombs, the sacred script bring
into visual evidence the excellence of Egyptian civilization and hence mirrors
Egyptian life as an idealized, a-historical (timeless) "golden" form. Precisely
this strong desire of most Ancient Egyptians to visualize the afterlife after
this-life, and to give an account of the heaven of their desires (in particular
in tombs of kings, royals and high officials), makes us recover, through
hieroglyphs, parts of the overall typology of their ante-rational mindset, which
is lost. These artworks, or archetypes of Ancient soteriology, try to eternalize
what was the most creative and efficient, namely the luminous & self-created
Re-spirit of eternity-in-everlastingness (Atum-afloat-in-the-Nun,
the boundless ocean of darkness).
Contrary to other languages (except perhaps Linear A, Maya script and Chinese), Egyptian
introduced visual glyphs (pictorial materializations, actualizations or
sedimentations of meaningful shared states of consciousness). These various
visual and artistic representations of crucial typologies brought in
effect (in its classical form) a variety of categories, namely : man and his
occupations, woman and her occupations, anthropomorphic deities, parts of the
human body, mammals, parts of mammals, birds, parts of birds, amphibious
animals, reptiles, etc., fishes and parts of fishes, invertebrates and lesser
animals, trees and plants, sky, Earth, water, buildings, parts of buildings,
etc., ships and parts of ships, domestic and funerary furniture, temple
furniture and sacred emblems, crowns, dress, staves, etc., warfare, hunting,
butchery, agriculture, crafts and professions, robe, fibre, baskets, bags, etc.,
vessels of stone and earthenware, loaves and cakes, writings, games, music,
strokes & geometrical figures (cf. the sign list of
Gardiner, 1982, pp.544-547).
Each visual glyph is a work of art. Because these glyphs (as cultural
sedimentations), represent an important part of the iconography of the Egyptian
mindset, they form a complex image-language with a sense of nuance broad enough
to encompass
ancient wisdom and its
teachings of the heart, and this for more than 3000 years. To put
into evidence the "sacredness" of hieroglyphs, we may try to visualize -with the
icons as windows to Egypt's wisdom- how the practical closure offered by this
proto-rational cognition created literature, religion and wisdom teachings.
Mature ante-rational thinking enables a first closure of mind, allowing concepts
to form concrete "blocks" or mental aggregates. These refer to concrete,
specific situations, local contingencies and geosentimental conceptualizations.
When the context is changed, the blocks no longer support each other and the
concept is undermined. So bound to changing contexts, the concrete concept is
unstable. This contrary to the second, stable closure of formal rationality,
which operates in the abstract and the decontextualized. Ante-rational thought
has no universal operator. Only existential contexts are denoted.
If communication is always based on signs, and the latter are signals (reptile
cortex), icons (limbic system) and symbols (neo-cortex - cf.
neurophilosophy), then hieroglyphs bring out the best of "emotional
intelligence", or the "intelligence-of-the-heart". Its icons bring the synthetic
function of symbols to the fore, and appeal -in the right-handed- to the right
hemisphere of the neo-cortex, processing spatiality and synthesis.
"Let us remember that prior being a device of physical
weighing, the pair of scales is the symbol for the act of exchanging physical
and intangible things. In other words, exchanging and not weighing is the main
thing."
Mancini,
2004, p.53.
An image is not a sequential symbol, but always a whole. It does not need to be
analyzed (like letters in a word), but grasped as a totality. Hence, besides
artistic aptitudes, the ability to visualize is trained as well as
thinking in images. Small visual details define important distinctions (for
example, the difference between G36, the swallow, & G37, the sparrow, is defined
by a tiny change in the tails). Subtlety and nuance are possible by adding
pictures with determinative meaning to the phonograms (together forming a
consonantal system of sounds).
logogram (word writing)
A logogram is the representation of a complete word (not individual
letters or phonemes) directly by a picture of the object actually denoted.
As such, it does not take the phonemes into consideration, but only the direct
objects & notions connected therewith. To compose a complete vocabulary with
logograms would however be cumbersome. As there were about 500 hieroglyphs in
common use, only the same number of words could have been written this way. The
rest of the ca. 17.000 known words had to be written with phonograms.
For example :
, depicting
the Sun, signifies : "Sun", is a logogram, for this sign alone denotes the Sun.
,
depicting a mouth, signifies : "mouth", is also a logogram.
Indeed, a writing system exclusively based on logography would have
thousands of signs to encompass the complete semantics of any spoken language.
Such a large vocabulary would be unpractical. Moreover, which pictures to use
for things that can not be easily pictured, like wisdom, understanding,
authoritative speech, love, justice and the like ? How to address grammar
(and simple categories as gender and number) ?
The theory according to which Ancient Egyptian was a complex allegorical
logography was refuted by Champollion in 1822. Most hieroglyphs represent
phonograms, not logograms (or ideograms, in the case of allegorical denotation).
As until recently sufficient insight into Egyptian was lacking, trustworthy
translations were slow to emerge and their assimilation by historians,
philosophers and philologists even slower. The impact of Ancient Egypt on
Judaism, Greece and Christianity (curtailing Hellenocentrism) has been put into
evidence only a few decades ago (cf.
Hermes the Egyptian, 2002 &
The Instruction of Amen-em-apt, son of Kanakht,
2003). Via
Alexandria, Egypt's
wisdom influenced the Hellenistic world and, much later, the
Renaissance (cf. the Orientale Lumen and the rise of
Hermeticism). This did not bring about a
historical Egypt, but an egyptomania turning romantic in the XIXth century.
phonogram (sound writing)
Egyptian phonography (a word represented by a series of sound-glyphs or
phonemes -letters- of the
spoken sounds) was derived through phonetic borrowing. Logograms are
used to write other words or parts of words semantically unrelated to the
phonogram, but with which they phonetically share the same consonantal
structure.
For example :
The logogram
, signifies
"mouth". It is used as a
phonogram with the phonemic value "r" to write words as "r", meaning
"toward" or to represent the phonemic element "r" in a word like "rn" or "name".
"rn" or "name" : the logograms of mouth and water
This pictorial phonography is based on the principle of the rebus : show
one thing to mean another. If, for example, we would write English with the
Egyptian signary and apply the rebus principle, then the word "belief" would be
written with the logograms of a "bee" and a "leaf" ...
The shared consonantal structure allows one to develop a large number of
phonograms with limited number of hieroglyphs. These, and not the logograms, as
in any other language, are the solid architecture of Egyptian.
The consonantal system was present from the beginning. Three main categories of
phonograms prevail :
-
uniconsonantal hieroglyphs
(one sign for one sound) : 26 (including variants) - they represent
a single consonant and are the most important and frequent group
of phonograms ;
-
biconsonantal hieroglyphs (one
sign for two sounds) :
a pair of successive consonants (ca. 100) ;
-
triconsonantal hieroglyphs :
(one sign for three sounds) :
a trio of successive consonants (ca. 50).
Duplets and triplets are often
accompanied by uniconsonantal hieroglyphs which partly or completely
repeat their phonemic value. This phonetic complementation is to
make sure the complemented hieroglyph was indeed a phonogram and not
a logogram and/or to have some extra calligraphic freedom in case a gap
needed to be filled ...
This phonography allowed a word of more than one consonant to be written
in different ways. But in Egyptian, economy was exercised and spellings
were relatively standardized, allowing for variant forms for certain words
only.
ideogram or semogram (idea writing)
Logograms are ideograms, concerned with direct meaning and sense,
not with sound. A pictorial ideography (a variety of hieroglyphs
-representing idea's, notions, contexts, categories, modalities, nuance
etc.-) adds meaning. Ideograms are semantic (and so semograms).
Egyptian has a particular type of ideogram, the determinative, derived
from logograms, and placed at the end of words to assist in
specifying their meaning when uncertainty existed. To the objective
sound-glyph (the phonetics, in this case, being the consonantal structures
with no vocalizations), an ideogram is added indicating the general
idea of the word.
A stroke for example was the determinative indicating the function of
the hieroglyph was logographic. The determinative specified the
intended meaning. Some were specific in application (closely connected
to one word), while others identified a word as belonging to a certain
class or category (the generic determinatives or taxograms).
Determinatives of a word would be changed or varied to introduce nuance.
The same hieroglyph can thus function as a logogram, a phonogram and a
determinative (O1, "pr" or "house", was regularly used in all three
functions) !
For example :
The logogram
, depicting
the Sun, signifies : "Sun" (in continuous texts, a stroke would be put
underneath the hieroglyph to indicate a purely logographic sense). Placed
at the end of words, it is related to the actions of the Sun (as in
"rise", "day", "yesterday", "spend all day", "hour", "period") and so
then the hieroglyph is a determinative. In the context of dates
however, it is a phonogram with as phonetic value the duplet "sw".
Besides these purely semantical functions, the determinatives also marked
the ends of words and hence assist reading. They help to identify the
"word-images" in a text, and point out the preceding signs are meant
as phonograms. Once established, these were slow to change, causing -as
early as the Middle Kingdom- great divergences between the written script,
becoming increasingly "historical", and the spoken, contemporary
pronunciations of the words.
In the New Kingdom and later, when Middle Egyptian became the ceremonial or
"sacred" language of the rituals, its hieroglyphs had lost touch with the
actual spoken tongue, although the magical, effective power of these
visual symbols abided, spurring the analogical frenzy of the native
Ptolemaic priesthood (bringing to number of hieroglyphs to more than 6000).
Until its demise (the last datable hieroglyph is a temple inscription on
the island of Philae, carved as late as ca. 394 CE), hieroglyphic writing
remained a consonantal, pictorial system, allowing for both phonograms &
determinatives to convey meaning. The latter, because of the specific
iconography, is symbolic in both the analytic and synthetic mode of
recording cognitive states in material glyphs.
05.
Intelligence-of-the-heart or the heart of wisdom.
The reptile brain emits signals to identify territory, aggression and food.
It has no emotions and is primarily occupied with immediate survival.
The mammalian brain concocts affects to color sensoric and motoric
stimuli. It contains the cranial endocrinal glands governing sexual
development, passions, sleep, dreams, pleasure and pain. Emotional
patterns gives rise to icons, or signs allowing consciousness to move from
an outer representation to an inner sensation (of light, sound, smell,
touch & taste), and this based on personal phantasmd, dream & wish. The
latter are computed and memorized by a limbic cortex constantly balancing
between lust and unlust, allowing gratification or triggering woe, and
more often the latter ... This system empowers the early mental function
of visual retention.
On the level of the neocortex, consciousness, identity, conceptual
cognition & willful action are processed and sedimented into symbols,
intended to compute information about inner states and outer phenomena.
The left hemisphere of the neocortex processes information sequentially,
the right hemisphere simultaneously (or parallel, accessing several inputs
at once). The digital mode of the left hemisphere deals with the
analytical mode, reducing variety to a defined abstractions. The right
hemisphere allows for the analogical mode, denoting quanta, making the
unity of the standard principle, rule or abstraction into a variety of
facts.
Symbols are semantic fields of meaningful patterns, associations,
connotations, etc. Analytic symbols are quantitative and measure our inner
& outer environment. Synthetic (or analogical) symbols are qualitative.
They constitute a network of connected & interdependent meaningful
associations around a semantic core which they constantly circumambulate,
bringing variety under unity. Synthetic symbols join different
associations to each other and bring this diversity in the cognitive act
of apprehending one sign.
"Thus a symbol is a material representation of
immaterial qualities and functions. It is an objectification of things
subjective in us and subliminal in nature, awakening us to a perception of
the world which may make us aware of a knowledge contained in our soul."
Schwaller de Lubicz,
1978, p.17.
The evocative power of an analogical symbol rallies a complete emotional
pattern, as it were triggering the whole network at once (cf. the role of
mandala in Buddhist Vajrayâna). Insofar symbols are introduced to evoke
subjective, vital responses, they are esoteric.
Hieroglyphs are sacred because -next to their utilitarian, arbitrary and
singular meaning or analytical function-, they also act as analogical
links between the reptilo-limbic systems & the right hemisphere of the
neo-cortex. In this mode, they play out their synthetic function.
"In this sense, the symbol is thus the object,
exterior to us, which awakens innate knowledge through the senses. This
creates our intuitive knowledge of the simultaneous, a continuity in which
a discontinuity is located."
Schwaller de Lubicz,
1978, p.62.
Complementarity rules the synthetic mode. A relationship between two
elements always prevails. If the active pole is forward activity,
then the passive pole moves by inverse activity.
"Earth's rightness lies in justice !
Speak not falsely - You are great.
Act not lightly - You are weighty.
Speak not falsely - You are the balance.
Do not swerve - You are the norm !
You are one with the balance,
if it tilts, You may tilt."
The Eloquent Peasant -
third petition, Middle Kingdom (Lichtheim,
1975, I.176).
In Ancient Egypt, the heart (mind) of mind "is the balance" and realizes
the constant exchange between divine and mundane levels of existence. The
"intelligence-of-the-heart" evoked by the Egyptian sages works
analogically. Its "practice" is elucidated by a symbol :
|

U38 "mxAt", balance, justice |
(Anubis checks the plummet and watches this small text-line) :
"Said he-who-is-in-the-tomb : 'Pay attention to the decision of
truth and the plummet of the balance, according to its stance.'"
Papyrus of Ani - XIXth Dynasty
Weighing Scene (cf. supra)
Chapter 30B - plate 3 |
This exhortation summarizes the practice of wisdom
found in Ancient Egypt, as well as their philosophy of well-being and art of
living happily & light-heartedly (for the outcome of the weighing is determined
by the weight of the heart). In this short sentence, the "practical method" of
the Ancient Egyptians springs to the fore : concentration, observation,
quantification (analysis, spatiotemporal flow, measurements) & recording
(fixating) with the sole purpose of rebalancing, reequilibrating & correcting
concrete states of affairs, using the plumb-line of the various equilibria in
which these actual aggregates of events are dynamically -scale-wise- involved,
causing Maat "to be done for them" and their environments and the proper Ka, at
peace with itself, to flow between all vital parts of creation.
So the "logic"
behind the operation of the balance involves 4 rules :
-
inversion : when a concept is introduced, its opposite is also
invoked (the two scale of the balance) ;
-
asymmetry : flow and energy are the outcome of inequality (the
feather-scale of the balance is a priori correct) ;
-
reciprocity : the two sides of everything interact and are
interdependent (the beam of the balance) ;
-
multiplicity-in-oneness : the possibilities between every pair are
measured by one standard (the plummet).
Wisdom ("sAA"), understanding ("siA"),
authoritative speech ("Hw") and effective power ("HkA") are the mental functions
developed by this ancient proto-rational civilization. As the theoretical,
formal, purely analytic mode is lacking (as are decontextualization and
universals), hieroglyphic thinking is close to the "instinctive" or
ante-rational approach of the "intelligence-of-the-heart".

In three millennia, this synthetic, analogical mode was able to develop a
range of ante-rational theologies, rituals and wisdom teachings. Heliopolitan,
Hermopolitan, Theban & Memphite
henotheist thought represented so many
answers to the same set of philosophical questions : How did creation come about
? What is man's place in the order of the universe ? How to speak and act justly
?
-
Memphite unity (body) :
Ptah is one & all-comprehensive (he is
Nun, Atum & Re). With mind he speaks the Great Word and creates
everything therewith. Pre-creation, first time & creation are all put
into one category, an exemplaric summation. Ptah was before creation,
during the first time, at the moment of creation and in every created
god & goddess, in all Kas & Bas, in all temples and on every altar ...
Just as Pharaoh alone faced the deities (everybody else had to face
him), so was every member of the Enneads (or constellations of deities
around a godhead), a manifestation of Ptah.
-
Heliopolitan ritual (appearance) : Atum-Re, afloat in
Nun, creates himself in the first time
and with himself his Ennead or company of gods & goddesses. Pre-creation
is left behind and hostile. Self-creative Re-Atum-Kheprer has
understanding (sia), wisdom (saa), authoritative utterance (hu, the
Great Word), magic (heka) and justice-truth (maat). His eternal
rejuvenation is based on his being all-light forever, life eternal &
mutating perpetually in his Bark. At night, Re navigates on the Nile of
the Duat, the underworld, the depth of which touches the primordial
chaos of pre-creation (or Nun, represented by
Osiris). His eternal cycle represents
"neheh", the perpetuity of eternity-in-everlastingness (or Atum in Nun).
The origin of creation was Atum, but the moment he autogenerates he
splits into a pair (Shu and Tefnut). Unity and differentiation walk hand
in hand. The first two "generations of gods" are natural principles :
Shu, Tefnut, Geb and Nut and the hypostases of physical phenomena : Air,
Moist, Earth & Sky. Only with the third generation of deities, did human
drama enter the picture. As is to be expected, they are represented by
anthropomorphic deities. Osiris, Isis, Seth and Nephthys are the prime
actors in the mystery play of the mythical "golden age", the grand story
of
Osiris ;
-
Hermopolitan magic (names) : Thoth is the head of the
pre-creational Ogdoad, composed of four frog-gods and their consorts.
When Thoth, as the sacred Ibis, drops the creative
Great Word from his beak, everything is
created. The mythical origin (before time and before the intermediate,
transient, fugal first time) is placed under the command of the divine
mind, the word of Re and the
god of magic ;
-
Theban
monarchy (power) :
Amun is one & all-comprehensive (he is
Nun, Atum & Re). Amun is the "king of the gods" and Pharaoh. Amun was
before creation, during the first time, at the moment of creation and in
every created god & goddess. Moreover, he is not only "before"
everything, but also "beyond" everything. Amun is one and millions.
Nevertheless, Amun hears the prayers of the poor and is near to the
devotees.
II : Conceptualization in
Western ontological thought.
06. Myth : simplifying "the beginning".
To situate, within the framework of Ancient
Greek history, "the Greek miracle" in general and the advent of philosophy in
particular, the following division is helpful :
-
Neolithic Age (7000 - 2600 BCE) : settlements of farmers in Crete and
mainland Greece ;
-
Bronze Age (2600 - 1100 BCE) : the Bronze Age, starting with the
arrival of peaceful immigrants on Crete, can be divided in two periods :
Minoan : This culture was palace-based.
Between ca. 2600 and 1600 BCE, no Greek influence was present on the island.
The Minoans reached their zenith between ca. 1730 and 1500 (the "Pax
Minoica"). Two scripts are attested : hieroglyphic (not yet deciphered)
& Linear A. The latter is nearly always used for administrative purposes
(the count of peoples & objects). The last phase of the Minoan neopalatial
civilization was characterized by Mycenæan influence (i.e. after ca.1600
BCE).
Mycenæan : Initiated ca. 1600 BCE, the
culture of these Greek speaking people spread over mainland Greece and
reached Crete. It was strongly influenced by Minoan protopalatial (ending
with the destruction of ca. 1730 BCE) & neopalatial culture, but remained
loyal to its own Greek character. Eventually they conquered Crete (ca. 1450
BCE) and caused the elaboration of Greek Linear B based on Cretan Linear A,
which is not a Greek language as evidenced by the few tablets found in
Linear A (for example, the word for "total" -often used in administrative
texts- cannot be understood as the archaic matrix of a Greek word).
So Minoan and Mycenæan cultures interpenetrated : before 1600 BCE, Crete had
directly influenced the formation of Early Helladic Greece but was itself
non-Greek (Linear A) - after 1450 BCE, Mycenæan Greece took over Minoan
culture on Crete and Greek Linear B was used by the Minoan treasury of Crete
in the postpalatial.
-
Dark
Age (1100 - 750 BCE) : "Dorian" Greece, pushing Greek culture a step
back ;
-
Archaic Age (750 - 478 BCE) : Greek culture reemerges ;
-
Classical Age (478 - 323 BCE) : the "polis" and the emergence of
classical, concept-rationalism.
Although the scattered Mycenæan
refugees probably kept parts of their linguistic tradition alive, the cultural
network which had existed beforehand had been destroyed by the Dorians and with
it a unified cultural form in Greece based on a shared language. Moreover,
Dorian culture was very likely oral.
During these obscure centuries, Greek culture, as a form shared by all the
inhabitants of Greece, was nonexistent. The marauding barbarians, who had
destroyed the fortified towns of the pre-Helladics, and had developed (thanks to
Crete) into the grand Mycenæan culture, were themselves destroyed by horned
plundering hordes from the North, identified by some as belonging to the Doric
branch of the Greek family ...
The second half of the tenth century BCE brought a distinct easing off in
depopulation, isolation, metal-shortages, architectural and artistic
impoverishment & regional disparities. Because important centers of Greek
civilization were still wrapped in obscurity, one can however not claim the
"Greek Renaissance" had already begun ... Moreover, these changes were confined
to the Aegean and its coasts.
In the memory of these few scattered groups, settling in the South of Greece and
able to safeguard the "original" Mycenæan form, Mycenæ became legendary &
heroic. In a sense, the Mycenæans represented the "mythical" past of the Ancient
Greeks ...
The length of the Dark Age (300 years) threw a devastating shadow on the
survival of Mycenæan culture. Note the name of this period refers to how
little is known about it and also points to the remarkable contrast between
Doric Greece & Mycenæan culture. The Dorians had no written language of their
own and did not use Linear B. Isolation and loss of skills characterized the
period.
The archaic mentality emerging in Ionia around 750 BCE and prefigurated in the
rigid Mycenæan "megaron" as well as in the complex geometrical design of Dorian
pottery, was stern, courageous, young, linear and geometrizing. But just like
the rigid Mycenæans had been fascinated by Minoan Crete and its "African"
elliptic and chaotic natural scenery, these Archaic Greeks were awestricken by
the formidable grandeur of (Afro-)Egyptian culture. Their own insistence upon
this should be taken serious. There was more than intellectual opportunism at
work here.
Of course, as Indo-Europeans, the Ionians had a couple of typical features of
their own :
-
individuality / authority : at the beginning of the Archaic
Age, there was a "crisis of sovereignty" (Vernant,
1962). It implied a new political problem : Who should rule and by virtue of
what authority ? The collapse of the Mycenæan palace civilization was
followed by a return to the small tribal organization (cf. the "ethnos").
This tension between individuality and social unity is fundamental to
understand Greek philosophy (culminating in the judgment of Socrates). The
view an individual had the right to rule by virtue of divine lineage
was undermined. Heroic individualism was slowly replaced by an egalitarian
ideal, in which archaic aristocratic authority was challenged. The building
of temples was an "argument" for the appropriation of civic authority and
helpful to keep control of the foundation of the economic power of the
landowners, the aristocrats (Hahn,
2001, p.237). They secured their claim by drawing a particular connection
between themselves together with a given deity and so integrated the
divergent fractions of the community through the regularity of worship ...
This swing of the pendulum between the particularism of the aristocrats and
the egalitarism of the democrats, remained a fundamental ingredient of Greek
culture & animated the Classical Greek "polis" ;
-
exploring mentality : at the beginning of the Archaic Age, the
population quadrupled and citizenship was increasingly connected with land
ownership, triggering a competition for land which motivated the
colonization. But besides these external causes, the Greeks were a curious
people, always eager to learn more by approving new ideas and linearizing
them in accord with their own abstract (generalizing, universalizing) frame
of mind. The dynamic nature of the Greek cultural form assisted a
decontextualized approach (while in Egypt, a sedentary mentality reigned and the
concrete concept never emerged without context) ;
-
unique dynamical script : the importance of their new system of
writing should not be underestimated : by fixating the vowels, the Greeks
were able to describe an state of affairs with a precision no other script
of antiquity possessed. This referential, objective linguistic capacity
enabled them to communicate through writing with more ease, precision &
objective validity. The Egyptian intellectual elite read and wrote
hieroglyphs, also used a short-script (hieratic) and mastered a common
script (Demotic, Coptic). The absence of vowels in hieroglyphic script
eternalized it and made it ill-equipped to cover both the immediate
situation as well as be precise. By adding vowels, the Greeks made writing
referential, dynamical and objectifying ;
-
linearizing, geometrizing mentality : proportion, measurement,
number, spatial organization, cyclical processes etc. "reveal" the
structure, form, order, organization of the cosmos. Numbers are more than
practical tools to categorize, for they reflect the genuine, authentic,
essential features of any object. A number never stands alone, for it
entertains numerous fixed mathematical relationships with other numbers and
spatial characteristics. These are described in general, universal, abstract
terms ("theoria"), to be distinguished from their particular, local,
concrete applications in architecture, sculpture, poetry etc. ("techné") ;
-
anthropomorphic theology : deities had a human face and in the
Mycenæan age, they were at times combined in one cult. At the beginning of
the Archaic Age, the pantheon was systematized by Homer and Hesiod, and each
deity received its task (as in human society). However, Greek religion was
undogmatic, for no sacred text existed. Xenophanes was
critical about Greek anthropo-morphic (and anthropocentric) polytheism,
proposing One Supreme God who was unlike anything human. Typical for Greek
soteriology (salvic theory), is insisting the human soul had to liberate
itself from the physical body through purification (cf. "ascesis" in
Orphism) or somehow trigger its release (cf. "katharsis" & "ekstasis" in the
Dionysian cult). Most major Greek emancipatoric theories will return to this
and understand the body as the prison of the soul (cf. Plato & Plotinus).
This would become the cornerstone of the Greek idea of "mystery", as opposed
to the
Egyptian view on the mysteries, in which
transformation and ascension are taught.
"Perhaps the greatest contribution of the Bronze Age to
Classical Greece was something less tangible, but quite possibly inherited :
an attitude of mind which could borrow the formal and hieratic arts of the
East and transform them into something spontaneous and cheerful ; a divine
discontent which led the Greek ever to develop and improve their
inheritance."
Higgings, 1997, p.190
(my italics).
So from the middle and late eight century BCE, profuse changes came about in the
outlook of Greek civilization. This "Greek Renaissance" was an Age of
Revolution. Exploration and codification (through settlement) were its
leitmotivs. This revival took place between ca. 750 and 650 BCE.
The Corinthian expansion probably took place at the end of the ninth century
BCE, while the establishment of a Greek settlement in the Levant is slightly
earlier. These colonizations did not leave a strong impact, while the eighth
century Greek colonies in southern Italy and Sicily shaped the history of
these regions for the next centuries. The early colonizations consisted of
forerunners of probably voluntary and spontaneous venturers, whereas those of
the eight century were the work of organized bodies of Greeks, possibly led by
an individual aristocrat and his retinue, stimulated by the growth of population
in the Greek homeland.
Greeks may have been marauding the Egyptian Delta perhaps as early as ca. 800
BCE, if not earlier. Because Ionian mercenaries had successfully assisted
Pharaoh Psammetichus I (664 - 610 BCE) in his battle against the Assyrians, the
Greeks were welcomed in Egypt, enabling Miletus to found Neukratis and the
Greeks to settle in the Delta of Lower Egypt. Pharaoh Amasis (570 - 526 BCE)
allowed them to settle upstream (Heliopolis, Thebes). Of a direct influence of
Ancient Egyptian thought on these early visitors is more than likely (cf.
Hermes the Egyptian, part I, 2002).
Greek philosophy, the intellectual side of the "Greek miracle", was initiated in
Asia Minor, starting in Ionia ca. 600 BCE. Initiated
by Thales of Milete (ca. 652 - 545 BCE), it
commenced with a pre-rational approach of nature (the material pole), and,
thanks to Pythagoras of Samos (ca. 580 BCE - 500), who coined the term
"philosophy", added a study of proportion and number (the mathematical pole).
These early philosophers tried to do away with mythological
explanations, whereas the symbolism of Pythagoras coupled their naturalism with a
mysticism of numbers, allowing natural phenomena to be related to each other in
abstract, theoretical terms.
Identifying the myths of
Mycenæan heroism, the pantheon (Hesiod) and
the works of Homer as representing the mythical and pre-rational phases of
Greek cognition, we see the Ionians gather the central themes of Greek thought
in proto-rational terms. A closure is realized by justifying the world by its
origin & the role of man by symbolization. Each pre-Eleatic posits a pivot, an
ontological foundation for what exists. The
multiplicity of mythical views is challenged by the unification around a single
principle. This proto-rationality exceeds itself, and paves the road for the
conceptual rationality of the Eleatics, the sophists and Classical Philosophy.
With the introduction of conceptual
rationality by Parmenides of Elea (ca. 515 - 440
BCE) &
Democritus of Abdera (ca. 460 - 380/370 BCE), the stage is set for the
ontological tradition of the West long before the Platonic and Peripatetic
systems.
Thales of Miletus
There is a consensus, dating back at
least to the 4th century BCE and continuing to our present academical history of
Greek philosophy, of Thales of Miletus being the first Greek philosopher.
According to the Greek thinker Apollodorus, he was born in 624 BCE. The Greek
historian Diogenes Laërtius (ca. 3th century CE) placed his death in the 58th
Olympiad (548 - 545 BCE), at the age of 78. He also affirms Thales traveled to
Egypt, while Iamblichius explains how he advised other intellectual Greeks to go
to Egypt in order to learn :
"Thales advised Pythagoras to go to Egypt and to
entertain himself as much as possible with the priests of Memphis and Diospolis
: it was from them that he had drawn all the knowledge which made him a sage
and a scientist in the eyes of the masses."
Iamblichius : Life
of Pythagoras, 12, my italics.
During his lifetime, the word "philosopher" (or "lover of wisdom") had not yet
been coined. Thales was counted, however, among the so-called "Seven Wise Men"
(the "sophoi"), whose name derives from a term designating inventiveness and
practical wisdom rather than speculative insight (consistent with the
Ancient Egyptians'
notion of wisdom). In fact, today we reckon Thales to be the only
"philosopher" on that list !
Thales tried to transmit to the Greeks the mathematical knowledge he had derived
from the Babylonians (who, when conquering Egypt in the Third Intermediate
Period, had influenced its astronomy profoundly). Thales sought to give it a
more exact foundation and used it for the solution of practical problems, such
as the determination of the distance of a ship as seen from the shore or of the
height of the Gizza pyramids. Though he was also credited with predicting an
eclipse of the Sun, it is likely he merely gave a natural explanation of
one on the basis of Babylonian astronomical knowledge (cf. the Saros-period
between eclipses).
Thales' significance for Greek philosophy, lies less in his choice of water as
the essential substance, than in his attempt to explain nature by the
simplification of phenomena. Indeed, Thales searched for causes within nature
itself rather than in the caprices of the anthropomorphic gods. He was
deemed the first Greek to give a purely natural explanation of the origin of the
world, free from all mythological ingredients and unnecessary complexities
(linearization and homogeneity). The claim Thales was the founder of Greek
philosophy rests primarily on Aristotle, who wrote he was the first (Greek) to
suggest a single material substratum for the universe, namely, water, or
moisture ...
Even though Thales renounced mythology, his choice of water as the fundamental
building block of matter had its precedent in the Egyptian tradition (cf. "Nun",
the undifferentiated primordial waters before time and space and its "Ba" or
"soul", the autogenitor Atum). To Thales, the entire universe is a living
organism, nourished by exhalations from water (cf. Egypt's organic, hylozoistic
view on creation).
It is true Thales made a fresh start on the basis of what a person could
observe and figure out by looking at the world as it presented itself. This
procedure naturally resulted in a tendency to make sweeping generalizations on
the basis of rather restricted but carefully checked observations. Milesian
thought prompted philosophy to move beyond the localized, contextualized &
traditional thought of the cultures surrounding it.
In geometry, Thales has been credited with the discovery of five theorems :
(1) a circle is bisected by its diameter ;
(2) angles at the base of a triangle having two sides of equal length are equal
;
(3) opposite angles of intersecting straight lines are equal ;
(4) the angle inscribed in a semicircle is a right angle ;
(5) a triangle is determined if its base and the angles relative to the base are
given.
The mathematical achievements of Thales are difficult to assess. The ancients
credited particular discoveries to men with a general reputation for wisdom.
However, their logic evidences the linear and geometric spirit of the Greeks.
Surely, before Thales, Egyptians and Mesopotamians had arrived at the truths
represented by these theorems. But the way the Greeks recorded and fixated
knowledge in more abstract, discursive, denotative and context-independent
terms, was highly original. It is these linearizing & symbolical activities
which foremost characterize the "Greek miracle", not observation, recording and
comparison. The latter can be done with proto-rational concepts too. But formal
reason is precisely this : a reduction of a variety (a manifold) to a limited
number of categories. This in order to seek a universal proposition (a
conclusion) on the basis of a universal major and an empirical minor. The latter
was provided by the storehouse of practical knowledge cherished in all important
Egyptians temples (cf. Memphis, Heliopolis, Hermopolis, Abydos & Thebes).
Anaximander of Miletus
Thales' friend, disciple and successor, Anaximander of Miletus (ca. 611 - 547
BCE), is said to have given a more elaborate account of the origin and
development of the ordered world (the cosmos). However, his writings are lost,
and although still available to Apollodorus of Athens (cf. Chronica, ca.
140 BCE), they are not known to have been used by any other writer later than
Aristotle and his successor Theophrastus of Eresus (ca. 370 - 285 BCE). The
latter's Phusikos Doxai is also lost, but repeated by Simplicius (6th
century CE). All ancient doxographers depend on the latter's Physics
(Diels).
Doxography evidences Anaximander wrote treatises on geography, astronomy, and
cosmology surviving for several centuries. He made a map of the known world,
prized symmetry and introduced geometry and mathematical proportions into his
efforts to map the heavens. Thus, his theories departed from earlier, more
cosmogonic conceptions of the universe and prefigured the achievements of
later astronomers.
Unfortunately, we only possess one sentence of Anaximander's writings. In this
sentence, Anaximander explains a "need" or "necessity" (a moral imperative at
work in creation) operating between the elements (as well as in human society)
:

"But where
things have their origin, there too they must pass away, as it should ; for
indeed, they give one another justice and penalty for their injustice, in accord
with the ordinance of time."
Simplicius : Commentary
on the Physics, 24.13v, my translation.
According to him, the cosmos developed out of the "apeiron", the boundless,
infinite and indefinite (without distinguishable qualities). Aristotle would add
: immortal, Divine and imperishable.
Within this "apeiron" something arose to produce the opposites of hot and cold.
These at once began to struggle with each other and produced the cosmos. The
cold (and wet) partly dried up (becoming solid Earth), partly remained (as
water), and -by means of the hot- partly evaporated (becoming air and mist), its
evaporating part (by expansion), splitting up the hot into fiery rings, which
surround the whole cosmos. Because these rings are enveloped by mist, however,
there remain only certain breathing holes visible to men, appearing to
them as Sun, Moon, and stars.
"The Greeks seem to have received from Egypt their old
celestial architecture, as well as that of their temples. It is only when
conceived in this way, as a roof, that the 'ouranos' can be described as
'brazen' or (in the Odyssey) as made of iron. The reference is no doubt
to the great solidity of the edifice. Hesiod has much the same thing in mind
when he calls it, 'a seat set firm'."
Kahn, 1994, p.139.
Anaximander realized upward and downward are not absolute. Downward means toward
the middle of the Earth and upward away from it, so the Earth has no need to be
supported by anything (as Thales had believed). Instead, he asserted the Earth
remained in its unsupported position at the centre of the universe because it
had no reason to move in any direction and therefore was at rest.
Starting from Thales' observations, Anaximander tried to reconstruct the
development of life in more detail. Life, being closely bound up with moisture,
originated in the sea. All land animals, he held, are descendants of sea
animals. Gradually, however, the moisture will be partly evaporated, until in
the end all things will have returned into the undifferentiated "apeiron", in
order to pay the "penalty for their injustice", i.e. of having struggled against
one another.
Anaximander subscribed to the philosophical view unity could definitely be
found behind all multiplicity.
Anaximenes of Miletus
Anaximander's successor, Anaximenes of Miletus (ca. 585 - 525 BCE), taught Air
was the origin of all things. Neither Thales nor Anaximander appear to have
specified the way in which "the other things" arose out of the water or the
"apeiron". Anaximenes, however, declared the other types of matter arose out of
Air by condensation and rarefaction. In this way, what to Thales had been merely
a beginning, became a fundamental principle remaining essentially the same
through all of its transmutations.
Thus, the term "arche", which originally simply meant "beginning," acquired the
new meaning of "principle," a term henceforth playing an enormous role in
philosophy. This concept of a principle remaining the same through many
transmutations is, furthermore, the presupposition of the idea nothing can
come out of nothing. All of the comings to be and passing away we observe, are
nothing but transmutations of something remaining essentially the same for ever
(the law of conservation).
Pythagoras of Samos
The Ionian naturalists (materialists)
were individuals, and although Anaximander had Thales as a teacher, no "school"
emerged after their death. With Pythagoras
(ca. 580 BCE, island of Samos, Ionia -
ca. 500, Metapontum, Lucania), this son of an engraver of gems, we encounter the
first Greek "school" of thought, a teaching in which religion, mysticism,
mathematics and philosophy were allowed to interpenetrate each other and
orchestrate a totally new symphonic whole, which will have a decisive
influence on Greek thought as well as on Greek architecture. This was so unique,
that Pythagorism may well be called the second major orientation in pre-Socratic
philosophy next to Milesian materialism as a whole.
According to tradition, the very word "philosophy" was coined by Pythagoras,
who described himself as a "philo-sophos", a "lover" of wisdom. With his school,
the scope of the Milesian "sophoi" was dramatically enlarged by the introduction
of metaphysics, mystical experience and the philosophy of mathematics (including
Pythagorean numerology). These speculative considerations took place "next to"
physical inquires into the nature of all possible beings. With his emphasis on
numbers and the theology of arithmetic (cf. Nicomachus of Gesara's The
Theology of Arithmetic, ca. 100 CE), Pythagoras completed mathematics, for a
complete study of geometry was taken for granted (for part of the "know-how" of
the Milesian "sophoi").
The combination of geometry and arithmetic, was called the "tetraktys" (from
"tetra", "four"), after the form of a four-tiered triangular patters of ten
dots, the sacred symbol upon which Pythagorean Oats were sworn, and which
probably had its origin in the arrangements of pebbles used to study
mathematics. It is "holy", because of its summarizing manifestation of
completion. It is "sacred", because it contains a secret which is kept out of
sight of the inept ...

TETRAKTYS - ultimate sacred number
"delta" shaped form
(cf. "deka", ten) in four ("tetra") rows
directly influenced Hebrew qabalah and its 10 "Sephiroth"
as well as the structure of the 4 qabalistic worlds
Unfortunately, none of the writings of Pythagoras have survived, and
Pythagoreans invariably supported their doctrines by indiscriminately
citing their master's authority. It is difficult to distinguish his
teachings from those of his disciples, neither legends from historical
fact. However, he is credited with the theory of the functional
significance of
sacred numbers in the objective world and in music (obtained by
stopping a lyre string at various points along its length - the octave (2:
1), the fifth (3: 2) and the fourth (4: 3)). Other discoveries often
attributed to him, like the incommensurability of the side and diagonal of
a square, and the Pythagorean theorem stating the square of the
hypotenuse of a right-angled triangle equals in area to the sum of the
squares of the other two sides (well-known in Egypt and Mesopotamia), were
probably developed only later by the Pythagorean school.
Diogenius Laërtius also tells us Pythagoras entered the Egyptian
temples and learned the secrets of their gods. This is a remarkable
testimony. The Egyptian gods were hidden from sight. Nobody, except
Pharaoh and his appointed priests, could enter the "holy of holies" and
face the deity. There was no communication between the deities and humans,
for gods c |